Talk:AR Discovery Scenarios/@comment-26423479-20150522133011

I do not really understand the need to define two axes for position location and relation proximity. Even if the Kurio project establishes a clear distinction between them, to me, both concepts seem rather interchangeable. To perform an automatic search for POIs based on location, I would rather employ a geofencing mechanism (point+distance, point+boundary_shape, etc.) to construct the POIs metadata and, later, let the users' device decide when it is looking at them directly, when they are around the corner or when they are within a specific distance.

Maybe this approach is not optimal for exteriors (due to the need to divide the three-dimensional space into multiple, connected chuncks), but I think it simplifies the discovery grid without losing too much detail.